Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Federal update

Dear Advocacy Network,

 

I wanted to make sure you knew about this upcoming webinar for AASA members. I know some of you are beginning to hear about federal efforts to engage schools in identifying students prone to radicalization. We are anticipating a large roll-out of federal programs later this spring aimed at asking school leaders to engage in efforts related to the FBI’s Countering Violent Extremism program. In addition, I know some of you are in discussions with your board or technology directors about software purchases or practices that you can use to identify students who may be prone to extremist behavior, and this webinar may be informative. Details below.

 

AASA Members Only: Can Schools Help 
Counter Violent Extremism?




http://www.aasa.org/uploadedImages/MichaelGerman.jpgPresenter:Michael German, fellow, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School

Michael German is a 16-year veteran of federal law enforcement. German served as a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, where he specialized in domestic terrorism and covert operations. German is now a fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National Security Program, which seeks to ensure that our government respects human rights and fundamental freedoms in conducting the fight against terrorism. 

German will present on federal efforts to engage schools in a relatively new, anti-terrorism initiative called Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). The program asks school personnel to assess children for their vulnerability to extremism. A number of vendors are also beginning to offer programs to districts to assist school leaders in monitoring students for exposure to radicalization within the school environment. 

German will share the research basis for conducting CVE programs in schools, specifically highlighting recent efforts in the UK to address extremism in schools. He will also answer questions such as:

1) Are there reliable indicators that can be used to determine who from the general population is going to become violent in the future? 

2) Can children be accurately assessed for their vulnerability to extremism? 

3) Do CVE programs suggest that Muslim religious practices and political viewpoints should be monitored by schools? 

4) What best practices can schools employ to determine whether a student may be headed toward a path of radicalization?

 

Best,

Sasha

 

 

Sasha Pudelski – Assistant Director, Policy & Advocacy – 703-774-6933 (cell)  AASA, The School Superintendents Association 1615 Duke Street – Alexandria, VA 22314

...........................................................................................................................................................

Join AASA  |  Access My AASA Portal  |  Register for the 2016 National Conference on Education  | Visit AASA.org

 

 




This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com

Sunday, January 10, 2016

Are we talking anymore???


By MARC LEVYPublished: Yesterday

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - For the first time since July, billions in electronic money transfers began rocketing out of the Pennsylvania Treasury to school districts, county governments and state vendors. With it seemed to go something else: urgency in the Capitol to settle a bipartisan budget fight that produced a record-long impasse.

A rush of action before Christmas over pressing concerns about schools and social services agencies staying open in January has been replaced by a new, bitter round of partisan finger-pointing and a completely new timeline.

That timeline is anyone's guess. Some suspect it could stretch until after the April 26 primary election.

"Certainly we're in uncharted territory," said Rep. Brian Ellis, R-Butler.

On Dec. 29, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf carved up a $30.3 billion budget package crafted by the House Republican majority leaders. It arrived on his desk after it became clear that a wider bipartisan budget deal supported by Wolf could not overcome setbacks before Christmas, and the Senate's Republican majority sent it as an alternative to save suffering schools, counties and social services agencies.

Wolf authorized $23.4 billion of it, calling it emergency funding, although he blasted it as well short of his standards to adequately aid public schools and social services and deal with a long-term deficit.

He vetoed billions had been intended for public schools, prisons and health care for the poor. That line-item veto is expected to renew pressure on lawmakers to give Wolf a budget package he'll sign, although it remains to be seen how quickly that pressure ramps up.

For now, Wolf's office said it will not negotiate. Rather, he is insisting the Legislature pass the $30.8 billion spending plan he had agreed to with House and Senate leaders and that came close to the finish line in December.

"The time for negotiations is over," Wolf's press secretary Jeff Sheridan said. "It's time to pass that budget."

It would have delivered several things Wolf had sought: a record boost in aid to public schools, a big bite out of the state's deficit and satisfaction of the counties' request for more social services aid. It also would have required a tax increase of more than $1 billion.

Primary election season is now imminent for 228 of the Legislature's 253 seats.

The deadline to file petitions to get on the ballot is Feb. 16, an important date for sitting lawmakers who are thinking about voting for a tax increase, and the potential that a tax increase fresh in the minds of voters would doom them to a successful challenge from the right.

With the immediate pressure off schools to borrow more or close, some in the Capitol now wonder if passage of a bipartisan budget deal will inevitably slide until the next pressure point.

Others wonder whether the brutal politics of the primary season will doom it.

"Now with all the passage of time, I think it's going to make it tough to get those Republican votes and the fact that those identified as 'yes' votes are going to be under pressure from Republicans not to vote 'yes' again," said Rep. Nick Kotik, D-Allegheny.

Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, said he is also done negotiating and that the bipartisan budget package is dead without passage of legislation the Senate GOP had sought to restructure the pension benefits for state government and public school employees. The bill was defeated in the House.

"Could it go on into April or May? Look, I think the divide has gone so deep over raising taxes that, for us, for Republicans raising broad-based taxes and getting absolutely nothing is the equivalent to insanity," Scarnati said.

House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Allegheny, said he is willing to work with anyone to wrap up a budget package and insists it could happen in the next couple weeks.

Lawmakers circulating petitions, Dermody said, would be better off being able to tell voters that they had completed a budget package. In any case, it won't be long before schools feel the pinch again, Dermody said.

Wolf is expected to deliver a budget proposal Feb. 9 for the fiscal year that starts next July 1, and many rank-and-file lawmakers aren't sure how a budget package for this year will be finalized, or when.

"The deeper we get, the less I think anyone knows how this is going to play out," said Rep. Nick Miccarelli, R-Delaware. "I fear we're headed toward long-term gridlock like what you see in DC."

___

Marc Levy covers politics and government for The Associated Press in Pennsylvania. He can be reached at mlevy@ap.org. Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/timelywriter. His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/author/marc-levy.

Update

Home
Search
Local
Categories

Pressure off, Pennsylvania's budget fight could be on ice

By MARC LEVYPublished: Yesterday

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - For the first time since July, billions in electronic money transfers began rocketing out of the Pennsylvania Treasury to school districts, county governments and state vendors. With it seemed to go something else: urgency in the Capitol to settle a bipartisan budget fight that produced a record-long impasse.

A rush of action before Christmas over pressing concerns about schools and social services agencies staying open in January has been replaced by a new, bitter round of partisan finger-pointing and a completely new timeline.

That timeline is anyone's guess. Some suspect it could stretch until after the April 26 primary election.

"Certainly we're in uncharted territory," said Rep. Brian Ellis, R-Butler.

On Dec. 29, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf carved up a $30.3 billion budget package crafted by the House Republican majority leaders. It arrived on his desk after it became clear that a wider bipartisan budget deal supported by Wolf could not overcome setbacks before Christmas, and the Senate's Republican majority sent it as an alternative to save suffering schools, counties and social services agencies.

Wolf authorized $23.4 billion of it, calling it emergency funding, although he blasted it as well short of his standards to adequately aid public schools and social services and deal with a long-term deficit.

He vetoed billions had been intended for public schools, prisons and health care for the poor. That line-item veto is expected to renew pressure on lawmakers to give Wolf a budget package he'll sign, although it remains to be seen how quickly that pressure ramps up.

For now, Wolf's office said it will not negotiate. Rather, he is insisting the Legislature pass the $30.8 billion spending plan he had agreed to with House and Senate leaders and that came close to the finish line in December.

"The time for negotiations is over," Wolf's press secretary Jeff Sheridan said. "It's time to pass that budget."

It would have delivered several things Wolf had sought: a record boost in aid to public schools, a big bite out of the state's deficit and satisfaction of the counties' request for more social services aid. It also would have required a tax increase of more than $1 billion.

Primary election season is now imminent for 228 of the Legislature's 253 seats.

The deadline to file petitions to get on the ballot is Feb. 16, an important date for sitting lawmakers who are thinking about voting for a tax increase, and the potential that a tax increase fresh in the minds of voters would doom them to a successful challenge from the right.

With the immediate pressure off schools to borrow more or close, some in the Capitol now wonder if passage of a bipartisan budget deal will inevitably slide until the next pressure point.

Others wonder whether the brutal politics of the primary season will doom it.

"Now with all the passage of time, I think it's going to make it tough to get those Republican votes and the fact that those identified as 'yes' votes are going to be under pressure from Republicans not to vote 'yes' again," said Rep. Nick Kotik, D-Allegheny.

Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, said he is also done negotiating and that the bipartisan budget package is dead without passage of legislation the Senate GOP had sought to restructure the pension benefits for state government and public school employees. The bill was defeated in the House.

"Could it go on into April or May? Look, I think the divide has gone so deep over raising taxes that, for us, for Republicans raising broad-based taxes and getting absolutely nothing is the equivalent to insanity," Scarnati said.

House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Allegheny, said he is willing to work with anyone to wrap up a budget package and insists it could happen in the next couple weeks.

Lawmakers circulating petitions, Dermody said, would be better off being able to tell voters that they had completed a budget package. In any case, it won't be long before schools feel the pinch again, Dermody said.

Wolf is expected to deliver a budget proposal Feb. 9 for the fiscal year that starts next July 1, and many rank-and-file lawmakers aren't sure how a budget package for this year will be finalized, or when.

"The deeper we get, the less I think anyone knows how this is going to play out," said Rep. Nick Miccarelli, R-Delaware. "I fear we're headed toward long-term gridlock like what you see in DC."

___

Marc Levy covers politics and government for The Associated Press in Pennsylvania. He can be reached at mlevy@ap.org. Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/timelywriter. His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/author/marc-levy.

Story Options
Rate     

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

New solution??????

Rep. Sturla circulating new severance tax proposal

By 

A solution is in the works to solve two hot-button topics at the state Capitol: pension obligations and the taxation of natural-gas drilling.

State Rep. Mike Sturla (D-Lancaster) today began circulating a co-sponsorship memo that proposes what he calls a "fair" severance tax on natural-gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale.

That plan, which includes a sliding tax rate of 4 to 9 percent, based on gas prices, would generate revenue to cover pension costs for the state and for local school districts, as well as help struggling municipal pension systems.

Monday, January 4, 2016

S&P report on PA Budget

By Kevin Flowers  814-870-1693 Erie Times-News December 31, 2015 05:55 AM

Standard & Poor's Rating Services has weighed in on Pennsylvania's $30.3 billion state budget package, which was partially rejected by Gov. Tom Wolf on Tuesday.  The company, which rates the credit of governments and municipalities, does not like what it sees.  In a news release issued late Tuesday, Standard & Poor's called the budget plan passed by state legislators "structurally unbalanced" and said that it does not include needed pension reforms.  "As proposed, the budget had a $500 million budget gap for fiscal 2016 and left a $2 billion budget gap for fiscal 2017," according to the company's release.

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Budget

Add this article to a Custom Folder Printable version E-mail this article Email this article to yourself    (Budget)

Partial state budget is good news for schools, but maybe not for long.

By PETER JACKSON
Associated Press

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP, Jan. 2) — The partial state budget Gov. Tom Wolf signed this week brought good news for Pennsylvania's 500 school districts, provided a stage for political venting by the leaders of state government and underscored the bad news: The budget standoff will stretch into a seventh month.

The Democratic governor exercised his line-item veto power to erase about one-quarter of the $30.3 billion in spending approved by the Legislature's Republican majorities. He signed off on $23.4 billion that includes long overdue financial relief for school districts, social service providers and county governments.

After six months without state subsidies, the release of $3.5 billion for basic and special education was "extremely important," said Jay Himes, director of the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials.

"I think it moved some districts back from the edge in terms of the need to borrow," Himes said. It also helped "back down the frustration and skepticism level of schools throughout the state."

Not so in the executive branch, where the Wolf administration had hoped to wrap up a $30.8 billion bipartisan budget deal that would boost education spending to historic levels and shrink a long-term budget deficit that has hurt the state's credit rating while increasing unspecified taxes by more than $1 billion.

When the deal unraveled just before Christmas, after a Senate pension restructuring bill crucial to the deal stalled in the House, Republicans retreated and approved the less costly measure and sent it to the governor's desk. After weighing his options for a few days, an angry Wolf announced his line-item veto.

The GOP budget was "a ridiculous exercise ... garbage," he said, that would allow spending to exceed projected revenue, leaving a budget hole of $500 million in the year that ends June 30. He said Republican legislators "left town before finishing their jobs" and demanded that they resume work on the budget.

Republicans responded that Wolf could have avoided the interruption of state funds for schools and social services altogether by using his line-item veto authority instead of rejecting the entire budget that GOP lawmakers approved along party lines when the previous budget year ended June 30.

GOP leaders in both chambers characterized the present situation as an opportunity to "reset" negotiations in a renewed attempt to reach a compromise.

"This is really a five-party discussion," said Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre. "The one thing that we have to do as a state government is pass a budget."

"We will continue conversations with the governor and Senate — Republican and Democrat — to come to a reality-based budget solution," House Speaker Mike Turzai and Majority Leader Dave Reed said in a joint statement.

There is no shortage of issues on the table.

Both the budget Wolf vetoed and the one he hopes to salvage would require tax increases, but it remains unclear which taxes would rise, how much money they would generate and whether they stand a chance in the Legislature.

Among the pending major bills is the pension proposal, which would mandate a 401(k)-style benefit for future state and public school employees and limit future benefits of current employees. Another would allow 14,000 holders of takeout beer licenses, including restaurants, hotels and supermarkets, to buy licenses allowing them to sell as many as four bottles of wine per customer. Both bills are pending in the House.

Also in limbo are bills directing the distribution of nearly $6 billion a year for public schools and $600 million in subsidies for state-related universities, including Penn State, Pitt, Temple and Lincoln.

David Patti, president and CEO of the Harrisburg-based Pennsylvania Business Council, said the release of school and social services money will buy time for budget negotiators, but that the multitude of issues and persuasive arguments for each can make a consensus difficult to achieve.

"What do you do when everybody's right?" Patti asked. "These are not bad people trying to do malicious things."

____